Penyusunan Framework for Teaching berbasis Anderson Krathwohl Taksonomi
Keywords:
Anderson Krathwohl taxonomy; developving; framework for teaching.Abstract
Learning objectives can be achieved if learning activities are planned appropriately. This article provides an overview of the participants' understanding of the Anderson Krathwohl Taxonomy, identifies the learning objectives in the Anderson Krathwohl taxonomy table, and designing learning activities based on it. This community service activity was carried out through two stages, planning and implementation, with 20 participants consisting of alumni and students of PGMI UIN Antasari Banjarmasin and PGMI UNISKA Muhammad Arsyad al-Banjari Banjarmasin. Participants' abilities were measured through objective tests (multiple choices). The participants' pretest results were in the low category with an average score of 52, the post-test results were in the high category with an average score of 73.2. There is an increase in the average value of 21.2 points. All participants have succeeded in developing a lesson plan which is poured into the learning path and learning activities. Teachers should understand the concepts of Anderson and Krathwohl Taxonomy (AKT) when developing lesson plans (Framework for Teaching) in order to be able to direct learning objectives and help students develop critical thinking skills (HOTS).
References
Alimuddin, Zulfikar, Nikmah Hariati, Muhammad Anshori, Muhammad Zamrony, Siti Raudhah, Dhea Amanda, Awaludin, dkk. HOTS untuk Social Sciences. Barito Kuala: HAFECS Press, 2019.
Almah, Almah, dan Makherus Sholeh. “Teacher Skills in Teaching Low-Grade Class on Thematic Learning at MI Nurul Islam Pemurus Baru.” Al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Primary Education 6, no. 2 (16 Oktober 2023): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-aulad.v6i2.28350.
Amin, Novita Fitri. “Penerapan Teknik Think Talk Write Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Karangan Narasi Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 7 Pamekasan.” Eduthink: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 02, no. 01 (2021): 83–144.
Anderson, Lorin W., dan David R. Krathwohl. Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2001), xix. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2001.
Gülay Ekren dan Nilgun Ozdamar Keskin. “Using The Revised Bloom Taxonomy In Designing Learning With Mobile Apps.” GLOKALde 3, no. 1 (2017): 13–28.
Gunawan, Imam, dan Anggarini Retno Palupi. “Taksonomi Bloom – Revisi Ranah Kognitif: Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, Dan Penilaian.” Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran 2, no. 02 (14 November 2016). http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/PE/article/view/50.
Hakim, Lukmanul, Safruddin Safruddin, dan Husniati Husniati. “Analisis Kesulitan Guru dalam Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar (SD) Yayasan Hadi Sakti.” Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan 8, no. 1 (1 Februari 2023): 142–53. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i1.1100.
Kasidi. “Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru Dalam Pembuatan Kelengkapan Perangkat Pembelajaran Daring Melalui Supervisi KepalaSekolah Di UPTD SDN Tlambah 1.” Eduthink: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam 3, no. 2 (2022): 1–15.
Mahmawati, Diyah, dan Kurnia Devi Yuswandari. “Perencanaan Pembelajaran (Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidik).” Joedu: Journal Of Basic Education 02, no. 01 (2023): 1–16.
Nafiati, Dewi Amaliah. “Revisi Taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, Afektif, Dan Psikomotorik.” Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum 21, no. 2 (31 Desember 2021): 151–72.
Prastowo, Andi. Analisis Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2019.
———. Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Tematik Terpadu: Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 untuk SD/MI. Cet. 2. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Rohani, Ahmad. Pengelolaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
Rukmini, Elisabeth. “Deskripsi Singkat Revisi Taksonomi Bloom.” MAJALAH ILMIAH PEMBELAJARAN 4, no. 2 (10 Oktober 2008). https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/mip/article/view/7132.
Sa’dun, Sa’dun. Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.
Saifudin, M. Fakhrur, dan Hanum Hanifa Sukma. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Calon Guru SD Melalui Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Dan Praktik Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra SD.” Varia Pendidikan 30, no. No. 2 (Desember 2018): 55–63.
Sholeh, Makherus. “Transformational Leadership: Principal Intellectual Stimulation In Improving Teacher Competences.” Al-Ta Lim Journal 28, no. 2 (31 Juli 2021): 167–79. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v28i2.708.
Sholeh, Makherus, Raihanatul Jannah, Mahmudah Mahmudah, dan Khairunnisa Khairunnisa. “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Efektif Dan Bermakna Di MI Perwanida Blitar.” Muallimuna : Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah 6, no. 2 (30 April 2021): 16. https://doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v6i2.4301.
Sufiati, Vivi, dan Sofia Nur Afifah. “Peran perencanaan pembelajaran untuk performance mengajar guru pendidikan anak usia dini.” Jurnal Pendidikan Anak 8, no. 1 (21 Agustus 2019): 48–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpa.v8i1.26609.
Sumantri, Mohamad Syarif. Strategi Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktik di Tingkat Pendidikan Dasar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2015.
Supyati, Hana Muldi. “‘Pengaruh Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Guru Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Dengan Mediator Motivasi Belajar (Survey pada Siswa Kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Garut),’” 2020.
Uno, Hamzah B., Nina Lamatenggo, dan Satria Koni. Desain Pembelajaran. Bandung: MQS Publishing, 2010.
Utami, Yossy Wirda, Desni Yuniarni, dan Lukmanulhakim Lukmanulhakim. “Analisis Tingkat Pemahaman Guru Terhadap Perencanaan Pembelajaran Pada Taman Kanak-Kanak Di Kota Pontianak.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK) 7, no. 1 (23 Januari 2018). https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i1.23724.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Raihanatul Jannah, Khairunnisa Khairunnisa, Makherus Sholeh (Penulis)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
